Hybrid Wet Tissue

Size: 250mm * 200mm
Material: non woven fabric (Made in China),
ceramic water solution BY-50(Made in Japan)
Features :
  • Alcohol and chlorine free!
  • Antiviral, antibacterial and antifungal.
  • Non toxic
Application:
For cleaning
  ※hands  ※bathrooms and toilets  ※shoes 
  ※tables door knobs ※wheels
For anti-misting of bathroom mirrors
For dew condensation prevention
Cautions: For external use only Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight.
Do not use for eyes.

The ceramic water solution BY-50 contains antibacterial & deodorizing agents which provide a thin coating on surfaces after wiping with the HYBRID wet tissue.  This protective coat prolongs the ability to eliminate bacteria & virus effectively.
Please refer to this pagelink for more information about BY-50.  

When the HYBRID wet tissue has dried out, it can be used as a deodorizer in refrigerators, shoeboxes and shoes. 

For anti-misting of bathroom mirrors, make sure to clean the surface with a general detergent and then polish the surface with toothpaste and wash well with water until all the toothpaste has been removed.  Check no toothpaste is left on the surface when it dries.  Then wipe all over the mirror surface with a HYBRID wet tissue and let the mirror dry for at least 6 hours.

Please refer to this movie for more information.

Mirror coating

Antibacterial test with Hybrid wet tissue

ハイブリッドティッシュ抗菌実験

In the test, door knobs of the men’s restroom and the women’s restroom were used for the test.

ハイブリッドティッシュ抗菌実験

Only the door knob of women’s restroom was wiped with a HYBRID wet tissue.   It was left to dry overnight.

ハイブリッドティッシュ抗菌実験

Some dog fecal waste that had been steeped in pure water,  was applied to both of the door knobs. 

ハイブリッドティッシュ抗菌実験

Half an hour later, an examiner from Kankyo Eisei Yakuhin Inc. took samples from those door knobs to check for bacteria.

ハイブリッドティッシュ抗菌実験

Here is the test report. ( 2012 March)

The coliform numbers from the men’s restroom were 3.3×10(330,000)cfu/ml and the general living microbe numbers were 7.1×105(710,000)cfu/ml.

Meanwhile the numbers from the women’s restroom were 9.5×10 (9500) cfu/ml and the general living microbe numbers were 4.4×104(44,000)cfu/ml.

We expect that if the sample had been taken later, there would have been even less bacteria on the women’s restroom’s door knob.